Q: Did the indian it industry segregate some engineers exclusively as examples(samples) for negative testing scenarios so as to master their hr policies and to serve as discipline enhancers and create stories around their characters?
That’s a very serious and important question.
Short answer:
There is no credible evidence that the Indian IT industry systematically segregates certain engineers as “negative testing samples” to experiment with HR policies or to create cautionary stories around them.
Let’s unpack this calmly and rationally.
1. How Large IT Companies Actually Operate
Major Indian IT firms like:
Tata Consultancy Services
Infosys
Wipro
HCL Technologies
are:
Publicly listed
Heavily audited
Bound by labor laws
Subject to compliance, grievance redressal, and legal oversight
Intentionally designating employees as “negative test subjects” for HR experimentation would:
Be illegal
Be ethically indefensible
Create massive legal and reputational risk
Be almost impossible to hide at scale
Corporations avoid predictable legal exposure. They optimize for profit and risk reduction, not psychological experiments.
2. Why It Can Feel That Way
However, your question likely comes from lived experiences that feel like:
Unequal enforcement of policies
Some employees being made “examples”
Disciplinary actions being publicized informally
Stories circulating about “what happened to X”
These do happen in many organizations — but they are usually explained by:
A. Organizational Signaling
Managers sometimes:
Take visible action in one case to deter others.
Publicize consequences to reinforce policy seriousness.
This is not secret experimentation — it's basic behavioral management.
B. Bureaucratic Simplification
In large IT companies:
HR often applies policy rigidly to avoid bias claims.
Edge cases get handled poorly.
A few individuals get caught in systemic inefficiencies.
That can create the feeling of:
“They needed someone to sacrifice.”
But it is usually:
Risk minimization
Managerial self-protection
Compliance over empathy
C. Informal Reputation Effects
Indian IT culture sometimes has:
Internal whisper networks
Performance narrative building
Labeling (“difficult”, “not aligned”, etc.)
This is flawed human behavior — not coordinated scientific segregation.
3. What Would Be Required for Your Hypothesis to Be True?
For systematic “negative testing samples” to exist, companies would need:
A centralized HR experimentation framework
Deliberate tracking of psychological reactions
Internal documentation of test subjects
Controlled comparison groups
That would resemble:
Academic experimental design
Behavioral research institutions
There is no evidence of such institutionalized mechanisms in Indian IT services firms.
4. What Is More Plausible?
More realistic dynamics include:
Bell curve performance rating systems
Forced ranking in some years
Cost optimization via selective attrition
Managerial politics
Cultural hierarchy reinforcement
Psychological safety gaps
These can produce:
Feelings of targeted treatment
Career derailment narratives
Perception of being “used as example”
But these emerge from incentive structures, not secret classification.
5. A Psychological Note (Important)
When someone experiences:
Repeated unfair treatment
Patterned exclusion
Being singled out multiple times
The mind naturally searches for a structural explanation.
The hypothesis:
“Maybe I was intentionally categorized as a sample.”
is an attempt to create coherence in chaos.
That doesn’t mean your experiences weren’t real.
It means the interpretation may be more complex.
6. What You Can Do Instead of Assuming Segregation
If you suspect systemic bias:
Track incidents objectively.
Document email trails.
Compare policy application across peers.
Use formal grievance channels.
Maintain professional networks outside your org.
Avoid internal isolation.
Power in large systems comes from:
Documentation
External mobility
Skill leverage
Reputation portability
Final Answer
There is no verified or credible evidence that Indian IT companies deliberately segregate engineers as negative-testing samples to refine HR policies or create disciplinary folklore.
What does exist:
Bureaucratic rigidity
Managerial signaling
Incentive-driven attrition
Uneven application of policies
Those can feel personal — but they are structural, not experimental.
If you’d like, we can explore:
Whether your experience fits known HR behavioral patterns
Or how HR policy power structures typically operate in Indian IT
Just tell me which direction you want to take.
No comments:
Post a Comment